APPLICATION OF THE SIMPLIFIED PSORIASIS INDEX (SPI) IN THE ROUTINE CLINICAL PRACTICE: A PILOT STUDY. / APLICACIÓN DEL SIMPLIFIED PSORIASIS INDEX (SPI) EN LA PRÁCTICA CLÍNICA HABITUAL: ESTUDIO PILOTO.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: the Simplified Psoriasis Index (SPI) is a recently validated tool in Spanish that measures psoriasis severity by integrating 3 different spheres: clinical severity (SPI-s), psychosocial impact (SPI-p), and natural history (SPI-i). Our objective was to study the validity and equivalence of this new scale compared to routinely used scales such as the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, PASI, and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: this was a cross-sectional and observational study that included 45 patients aged 18 to 74 years. Demographic data and information associated with psoriasis severity and the patients' quality of life were collected, using PASI, DLQI, and SPI simultaneously. The correlation of reference scales (PASI and DLQI) with SPI was examined. The degree of agreement between the 2 versions of SPI completed by the physician (proSPI-s) and self-administered by the patient (saSPI-s), was also studied. RESULTS: the mean age of the study population was 51 years, with a mean psoriasis history of 14.05 years. A strong correlation was found between PASI and proSPI-s (r = 0.89), as well as between DLQI and SPI-p (r = 0.89), with a moderate correlation being reported between PASI and saSPI-s (r = 0.52). The degree of agreement between proSPI-s and saSPI-s was moderate. CONCLUSIONS: these findings represent the initial results of real clinical practice using the validated Spanish version of SPI, making its use truly promising in the routine clinical practice.

Inmunoterapia vs. terapia diana en el paciente con melanoma avanzado y mutación BRAF V600, ¿por cuál comenzar? / Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy in Patients With Advanced Melanoma and the V600 BRAF Mutation: Which One First?

El paciente con melanoma avanzado, metastásico o de alto riesgo, cuenta con opciones de tratamiento sistémico, inmunoterapia y terapias dirigidas, que han mejorado significativamente su supervivencia. El 50% de los pacientes con melanoma presentan mutación del gen BRAF. La toma de decisiones en cuanto a la secuencia óptima de tratamiento sistémico debe tener en cuenta factores relacionados con el medicamento, factores clínicos del paciente, así como los propios del tumor. Aunque la combinación ipilimumab-nivolumab es la que proporciona mejores resultados de supervivencia en todos los pacientes, la toxicidad asociada y el perfil de las terapias diana las puede hacer recomendables como primera línea en pacientes en determinadas situaciones clínicas. El objetivo de esta revisión es proporcionar un algoritmo de toma de decisiones en cuanto a la primera línea de tratamiento sistémico, inmunoterapia vs. terapias dirigidas, en el paciente con melanoma avanzado con mutación BRAF (AU)

Systemic treatment with immunotherapy or targeted therapy can significantly improve survival in patients with advanced (metastatic or high-risk) melanoma. Fifty percent of patients with melanoma have a BRAF mutation. Decisions on optimal sequencing of systemic treatments should take into account drug- and tumor-related factors and patient characteristics. Although the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab is associated with the best survival outcomes, it is associated with significant toxicity. Targeted therapy may be a more favorable option in certain clinical situations. We review the literature on immunotherapy and targeted therapy in melanoma and present an algorithm for guiding decision-making on their use as first-line systemic treatments for advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma (AU)

[Translated article] Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy in Patients With Advanced Melanoma and the V600 BRAF Mutation: Which One First? / Inmunoterapia vs. terapia diana en el paciente con melanoma avanzado y mutación BRAF V600, ¿por cuál comenzar?

Systemic treatment with immunotherapy or targeted therapy can significantly improve survival in patients with advanced (metastatic or high-risk) melanoma. Fifty percent of patients with melanoma have a BRAF mutation. Decisions on optimal sequencing of systemic treatments should take into account drug- and tumor-related factors and patient characteristics. Although the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab is associated with the best survival outcomes, it is associated with significant toxicity. Targeted therapy may be a more favorable option in certain clinical situations. We review the literature on immunotherapy and targeted therapy in melanoma and present an algorithm for guiding decision-making on their use as first-line systemic treatments for advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma (AU)

El paciente con melanoma avanzado, metastásico o de alto riesgo, cuenta con opciones de tratamiento sistémico, inmunoterapia y terapias dirigidas, que han mejorado significativamente su supervivencia. El 50% de los pacientes con melanoma presentan mutación del gen BRAF. La toma de decisiones en cuanto a la secuencia óptima de tratamiento sistémico debe tener en cuenta factores relacionados con el medicamento, factores clínicos del paciente, así como los propios del tumor. Aunque la combinación ipilimumab-nivolumab es la que proporciona mejores resultados de supervivencia en todos los pacientes, la toxicidad asociada y el perfil de las terapias diana las puede hacer recomendables como primera línea en pacientes en determinadas situaciones clínicas. El objetivo de esta revisión es proporcionar un algoritmo de toma de decisiones en cuanto a la primera línea de tratamiento sistémico, inmunoterapia vs. terapias dirigidas, en el paciente con melanoma avanzado con mutación BRAF (AU)

Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy in Patients With Advanced Melanoma and the V600 BRAF Mutation: Which One First? / Inmunoterapia vs. terapia diana en el paciente con melanoma avanzado y mutación BRAF V600, ¿por cuál comenzar?

Systemic treatment with immunotherapy or targeted therapy can significantly improve survival in patients with advanced (metastatic or high-risk) melanoma. Fifty percent of patients with melanoma have a BRAF mutation. Decisions on optimal sequencing of systemic treatments should take into account drug- and tumor-related factors and patient characteristics. Although the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab is associated with the best survival outcomes, it is associated with significant toxicity. Targeted therapy may be a more favorable option in certain clinical situations. We review the literature on immunotherapy and targeted therapy in melanoma and present an algorithm for guiding decision-making on their use as first-line systemic treatments for advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma.

[Translated article] Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy in Patients With Advanced Melanoma and the V600 BRAF Mutation: Which One First?

Systemic treatment with immunotherapy or targeted therapy can significantly improve survival in patients with advanced (metastatic or high-risk) melanoma. Fifty percent of patients with melanoma have a BRAF mutation. Decisions on optimal sequencing of systemic treatments should take into account drug- and tumor-related factors and patient characteristics. Although the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab is associated with the best survival outcomes, it is associated with significant toxicity. Targeted therapy may be a more favorable option in certain clinical situations. We review the literature on immunotherapy and targeted therapy in melanoma and present an algorithm for guiding decision-making on their use as first-line systemic treatments for advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma.

Dermatology Care in Spanish Public Hospitals: A Mapping Study of Health Care Resources and Medical and Surgical Activity in Dermatology Departments in 2019. / Mapa asistencial dermatológico: descripción de los recursos estructurales y de la actividad médico-quirúrgica de los servicios de dermatología de los hospitales públicos españoles en 2019.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: No recent data on health care resources and medical and surgical activity in Spanish dermatology departments are available in the literature. The aim of this study was to compile this information for 2019. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study based on an online survey sent to the heads of dermatology departments at public hospitals in Spain. RESULTS: Of the 162 department heads contacted, 59 answered the survey (participation rate, 36.4%). General findings included a shortage of staff, especially dermatologists, in hospitals of low and medium complexity. The main reason given for the shortage of dermatologists was a lack of interested applicants. Large hospital complexes had more infrastructure and equipment. Over 50% of the departments surveyed used a combination of in-person and virtual visits. Psoriasis units were the most common specialized care units. Approximately 75% of the hospitals had operating rooms with an anesthetist. More complex procedures such as sentinel lymph node biopsy and Mohs micrographic surgery were performed more often in large hospital complexes. Hospitalization and the presence of dermatology residents working call shifts were also more common in these hospitals. Teaching and research activity differed according to hospital complexity. CONCLUSIONS: We have mapped health care resource availability and medical and surgical activity in Spanish dermatology departments prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings could be useful for improving clinical management and defining future actions and areas for improvement.

Epidemiology of Melanoma in Spain: Estimation of Number of Patients With Stage III Disease Eligible for Adjuvant Therapies. / Epidemiología del melanoma en España: estimación de los pacientes con melanoma con estadio III candidatos al tratamiento adyuvante.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Accurate information on the incidence of melanoma by stage and a better understanding of transition between stages are important for determining the burden of disease and assessing the impact of new adjuvant therapies on recurrence and survival. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence rates of the various stages of melanoma in Spain and to estimate the number of patients with stage III disease who are eligible for adjuvant systemic therapies. MATERIALS AND METHOD: We built an epidemiological model using prospectively collected data from patients diagnosed with de novo or recurrent melanoma between 2012 and 2016 in the melanoma units of 4 public hospitals. RESULTS: The estimated crude incidence rates for stage I and II melanoma were 7 and 2.9 cases per 100,000 person-years, respectively. The corresponding rates for stage III and IV melanoma were 1.9 and 1.3 cases per 100,000 person-years; 25.8% of patients with stage III melanoma were stage IIIA, 47% were stage IIIB, and 27.3% were stage IIIC. The respective estimated incidence rates for recurrent stage III and IV melanoma were 1.1 and 0.9 cases per 100,000 person-years. Overall, 54% of patients with recurrent stage III melanoma had progressed from stage I or II; the other cases corresponded to changes in substage. Of the patients with stage III melanoma, 85% of those with a de novo diagnosis and 80% of those who had relapsed had resectable disease, meaning they were eligible for adjuvant therapy; 47% of these patients had a BRAF mutation. CONCLUSIONS: The above estimates could have a major impact on health care resource planning. Assessing the number of patients with melanoma who are eligible for adjuvant therapies in melanoma could help decision-makers and clinicians anticipate future needs for the management of this disease.

Mapa asistencial dermatológico: descripción de los recursos estructurales y de la actividad médico-quirúrgica de los servicios de dermatología de los hospitales públicos españoles en 2019 / Dermatology Care in Spanish Public Hospitals: A Mapping Study of Health Care Resources and Medical and Surgical Activity in Dermatology Departments in 2019

Antecedentes y objetivo: No existen datos actualizados sobre los recursos asistenciales ni la actividad médico-quirúrgica de los servicios de dermatología españoles. El objetivo de esta investigación es conocer la situación y actividad de dichos servicios durante el año 2019. Material y métodos: Estudio transversal mediante cuestionario online distribuido a los jefes de servicio de dermatología de hospitales públicos españoles. Resultados: De los 162 jefes de servicio encuestados, se obtuvo una participación del 36,4% (59/162). Se observó un déficit de personal generalizado, especialmente de dermatólogos en hospitales de complejidad media-baja. La principal causa del déficit de dermatólogos fue la ausencia de profesionales interesados. Las infraestructuras y equipamiento disponibles fueron superiores en los grandes complejos hospitalarios. La atención mixta presencial-telemática estuvo presente en más de la mitad de los centros. En el ámbito de las consultas monográficas, la de psoriasis fue la más implementada. Aproximadamente el 75% de los centros contaron con quirófanos con anestesista. Procedimientos quirúrgicos de mayor complejidad como la biopsia selectiva de ganglio centinela o la cirugía de Mohs se realizaban con mayor frecuencia en los grandes complejos hospitalarios. La hospitalización de pacientes y la presencia de dermatólogos residentes de guardia fueron igualmente más habituales en estos hospitales. La actividad docente e investigadora también se relacionó con la complejidad del hospital. Conclusiones: Nuestros resultados describen la situación de los servicios de dermatología españoles justo antes de la pandemia por COVID-19, y pueden ser útiles para la gestión clínica y para definir líneas de trabajo y áreas de mejora (AU)

Background and objective: No recent data on health care resources and medical and surgical activity in Spanish dermatology departments are available in the literature. The aim of this study was to compile this information for 2019. Material and methods:Cross-sectional study based on an online survey sent to the heads of dermatology departments at public hospitals in Spain. Results: Of the 162 department heads contacted, 59 answered the survey (participation rate, 36.4%). General findings included a shortage of staff, especially dermatologists, in hospitals of low and medium complexity. The main reason given for the shortage of dermatologists was a lack of interested applicants. Large hospital complexes had more infrastructure and equipment. Over 50% of the departments surveyed used a combination of in-person and virtual visits. Psoriasis units were the most common specialized care units. Approximately 75% of the hospitals had operating rooms with an anesthetist. More complex procedures such as sentinel lymph node biopsy and Mohs micrographic surgery were performed more often in large hospital complexes. Hospitalization and the presence of dermatology residents working call shifts were also more common in these hospitals. Teaching and research activity differed according to hospital complexity. Conclusions: We have mapped health care resource availability and medical and surgical activity in Spanish dermatology departments prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings could be useful for improving clinical management and defining future actions and areas for improvement (AU)

[Translated article] Dermatology Care in Spanish Public Hospitals: A Mapping Study of Health Care Resources and Medical and Surgical Activity in Dermatology Departments in 2019 / Mapa asistencial dermatológico: descripción de los recursos estructurales y de la actividad médico-quirúrgica de los servicios de dermatología de los hospitales públicos españoles en 2019

Background and objective: No recent data on health care resources and medical and surgical activity in Spanish dermatology departments are available in the literature. The aim of this study was to compile this information for 2019. Material and methods:Cross-sectional study based on an online survey sent to the heads of dermatology departments at public hospitals in Spain. Results: Of the 162 department heads contacted, 59 answered the survey (participation rate, 36.4%). General findings included a shortage of staff, especially dermatologists, in hospitals of low and medium complexity. The main reason given for the shortage of dermatologists was a lack of interested applicants. Large hospital complexes had more infrastructure and equipment. Over 50% of the departments surveyed used a combination of in-person and virtual visits. Psoriasis units were the most common specialized care units. Approximately 75% of the hospitals had operating rooms with an anesthetist. More complex procedures such as sentinel lymph node biopsy and Mohs micrographic surgery were performed more often in large hospital complexes. Hospitalization and the presence of dermatology residents working call shifts were also more common in these hospitals. Teaching and research activity differed according to hospital complexity. Conclusions: We have mapped health care resource availability and medical and surgical activity in Spanish dermatology departments prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings could be useful for improving clinical management and defining future actions and areas for improvement (AU)

Antecedentes y objetivo: No existen datos actualizados sobre los recursos asistenciales ni la actividad médico-quirúrgica de los servicios de dermatología españoles. El objetivo de esta investigación es conocer la situación y actividad de dichos servicios durante el año 2019. Material y métodos: Estudio transversal mediante cuestionario online distribuido a los jefes de servicio de dermatología de hospitales públicos españoles. Resultados: De los 162 jefes de servicio encuestados, se obtuvo una participación del 36,4% (59/162). Se observó un déficit de personal generalizado, especialmente de dermatólogos en hospitales de complejidad media-baja. La principal causa del déficit de dermatólogos fue la ausencia de profesionales interesados. Las infraestructuras y equipamiento disponibles fueron superiores en los grandes complejos hospitalarios. La atención mixta presencial-telemática estuvo presente en más de la mitad de los centros. En el ámbito de las consultas monográficas, la de psoriasis fue la más implementada. Aproximadamente el 75% de los centros contaron con quirófanos con anestesista. Procedimientos quirúrgicos de mayor complejidad como la biopsia selectiva de ganglio centinela o la cirugía de Mohs se realizaban con mayor frecuencia en los grandes complejos hospitalarios. La hospitalización de pacientes y la presencia de dermatólogos residentes de guardia fueron igualmente más habituales en estos hospitales. La actividad docente e investigadora también se relacionó con la complejidad del hospital. Conclusiones: Nuestros resultados describen la situación de los servicios de dermatología españoles justo antes de la pandemia por COVID-19, y pueden ser útiles para la gestión clínica y para definir líneas de trabajo y áreas de mejora (AU)

Epidemiología del melanoma en España: estimación de los pacientes con melanoma con estadio III candidatos al tratamiento adyuvante / Epidemiology of Melanoma in Spain: Estimation of Number of Patients With Stage III Disease Eligible for Adjuvant Therapies

Antecedentes y objetivo: Para estimar la carga real del melanoma y el impacto de las nuevas terapias adyuvantes sobre las recaídas y la supervivencia, se precisa conocer con mayor exactitud la incidencia por estadios y analizar la transición entre ellos. Este estudio pretende estimar dicha incidencia y determinar el número de pacientes en estadio III que podrían beneficiarse del tratamiento sistémico adyuvante en España. Materiales y método: Se elaboró un modelo epidemiológico basado en datos de pacientes diagnosticados de melanoma o en recaída, recogidos prospectivamente durante 2012-2016 por cuatro unidades de melanoma de centros sanitarios públicos. Resultados: Las tasas brutas de incidencia estimadas para estadios I y II se situaron en 7 y 2,9 casos por 100.000 personas-año, respectivamente. Para estadio III se estimó en 1,9 (25,8% en IIIA, 47% en IIIB, y 27,3% en IIIC), siendo la de estadio IV de 1,3. La tasa de recaídas en estadio III se estimó en 1,1, siendo para estadio IV de 0,9. El 54% de recaídas a estadio III procedían de estadios I/II, mientras que el resto progresaban desde subestadios III. En estadio III, un 85% de nuevos diagnósticos y un 80% de recaídas fueron resecables, por tanto, candidatos a adyuvancia, de los cuales el 47% presentaba mutación en BRAF. Conclusiones: Estas estimaciones podrían tener un impacto importante en la planificación de los recursos sanitarios. La proyección en el número de potenciales candidatos a adyuvancia puede ayudar a decisores y clínicos a anticiparse a futuras necesidades en el manejo del melanoma (AU)

Background and objective: Accurate information on the incidence of melanoma by stage and a better understanding of transition between stages are important for determining the burden of disease and assessing the impact of new adjuvant therapies on recurrence and survival. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence rates of the various stages of melanoma in Spain and to estimate the number of patients with stage III disease who are eligible for adjuvant systemic therapies. materials and method: We built an epidemiological model using prospectively collected data from patients diagnosed with de novo or recurrent melanoma between 2012 and 2016 in the melanoma units of 4 public hospitals. Results: The estimated crude incidence rates for stage I and II melanoma were 7 and 2.9 cases per 100,000 person-years, respectively. The corresponding rates for stage III and IV melanoma were 1.9 and 1.3 cases per 100,000 person-years; 25.8% of patients with stage III melanoma were stage IIIA, 47% were stage IIIB, and 27.3% were stage IIIC. The respective estimated incidence rates for recurrent stage III and IV melanoma were 1.1 and 0.9 cases per 100,000 person-years. Overall, 54% of patients with recurrent stage III melanoma had progressed from stage I or II; the other cases corresponded to changes in substage. Of the patients with stage III melanoma, 85% of those with a de novo diagnosis and 80% of those who had relapsed had resectable disease, meaning they were eligible for adjuvant therapy; 47% of these patients had a BRAF mutation. Conclusions: The above estimates could have a major impact on health care resource planning. Assessing the number of patients with melanoma who are eligible for adjuvant therapies in melanoma could help decision-makers and clinicians anticipate future needs for the management of this disease (AU)

[Translated article] Epidemiology of Melanoma in Spain: Estimation of Number of Patients With Stage III Disease Eligible for Adjuvant Therapies / Epidemiología del melanoma en España: estimación de los pacientes con melanoma con estadio III candidatos al tratamiento adyuvante

Background and objective: Accurate information on the incidence of melanoma by stage and a better understanding of transition between stages are important for determining the burden of disease and assessing the impact of new adjuvant therapies on recurrence and survival. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence rates of the various stages of melanoma in Spain and to estimate the number of patients with stage III disease who are eligible for adjuvant systemic therapies. materials and method: We built an epidemiological model using prospectively collected data from patients diagnosed with de novo or recurrent melanoma between 2012 and 2016 in the melanoma units of 4 public hospitals. Results: The estimated crude incidence rates for stage I and II melanoma were 7 and 2.9 cases per 100,000 person-years, respectively. The corresponding rates for stage III and IV melanoma were 1.9 and 1.3 cases per 100,000 person-years; 25.8% of patients with stage III melanoma were stage IIIA, 47% were stage IIIB, and 27.3% were stage IIIC. The respective estimated incidence rates for recurrent stage III and IV melanoma were 1.1 and 0.9 cases per 100,000 person-years. Overall, 54% of patients with recurrent stage III melanoma had progressed from stage I or II; the other cases corresponded to changes in substage. Of the patients with stage III melanoma, 85% of those with a de novo diagnosis and 80% of those who had relapsed had resectable disease, meaning they were eligible for adjuvant therapy; 47% of these patients had a BRAF mutation. Conclusions: The above estimates could have a major impact on health care resource planning. Assessing the number of patients with melanoma who are eligible for adjuvant therapies in melanoma could help decision-makers and clinicians anticipate future needs for the management of this disease (AU)

Antecedentes y objetivo: Para estimar la carga real del melanoma y el impacto de las nuevas terapias adyuvantes sobre las recaídas y la supervivencia, se precisa conocer con mayor exactitud la incidencia por estadios y analizar la transición entre ellos. Este estudio pretende estimar dicha incidencia y determinar el número de pacientes en estadio III que podrían beneficiarse del tratamiento sistémico adyuvante en España. Materiales y método: Se elaboró un modelo epidemiológico basado en datos de pacientes diagnosticados de melanoma o en recaída, recogidos prospectivamente durante 2012-2016 por cuatro unidades de melanoma de centros sanitarios públicos. Resultados: Las tasas brutas de incidencia estimadas para estadios I y II se situaron en 7 y 2,9 casos por 100.000 personas-año, respectivamente. Para estadio III se estimó en 1,9 (25,8% en IIIA, 47% en IIIB, y 27,3% en IIIC), siendo la de estadio IV de 1,3. La tasa de recaídas en estadio III se estimó en 1,1, siendo para estadio IV de 0,9. El 54% de recaídas a estadio III procedían de estadios I/II, mientras que el resto progresaban desde subestadios III. En estadio III, un 85% de nuevos diagnósticos y un 80% de recaídas fueron resecables, por tanto, candidatos a adyuvancia, de los cuales el 47% presentaba mutación en BRAF. Conclusiones: Estas estimaciones podrían tener un impacto importante en la planificación de los recursos sanitarios. La proyección en el número de potenciales candidatos a adyuvancia puede ayudar a decisores y clínicos a anticiparse a futuras necesidades en el manejo del melanoma (AU)

Guía de práctica clínica de melanoma de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología / Clinical Practice Guideline on Melanoma From the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV)

El diagnóstico y tratamiento del melanoma en atención especializada es un campo en el que se han producido numerosos cambios. El objetivo de esta guía es ofrecer a los dermatólogos españoles una referencia para resolver las dudas clínicas más frecuentes basándose en la evidencia actual. Para la realización de esta guía se escogió a miembros del Grupo Español de Dermato-Oncología y Cirugía con experiencia en el tratamiento de estos tumores y con interés en participar en la elaboración de la guía. Se hizo una adaptación de las guías de práctica clínica existentes mediante el método ADAPTE: inicialmente se resumió el proceso de atención y se elaboraron las preguntas clínicas relevantes. Se seleccionaron las guías mejor puntuadas mediante el instrumento AGREE II, realizando la búsqueda de las respuestas en dichas guías y elaborando las recomendaciones. Finalmente se sometió la guía a revisión externa. La guía se estructuró a partir de 21 preguntas clínicas que fueron seleccionadas por su relevancia, dado que se centran en aspectos que pueden plantear decisiones difíciles en el manejo del melanoma, y se han respondido empleando la evidencia obtenida de las mejores guías existentes. Entre las limitaciones de esta guía merece reseñarse que la evidencia es escasa para responder a algunas preguntas. En algunos aspectos el cambio es rápido y exige una actualización frecuente de la guía. Esta guía responde a preguntas habituales sobre el manejo del melanoma en la práctica clínica diaria, sirviendo a los dermatólogos como referencia en la toma de decisiones, siempre teniendo presente los recursos y preferencias del paciente

Specialist approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma have undergone many changes. This guideline aims to provide Spanish dermatologists with evidence-based information for resolving the most common doubts that arise in clinical practice. Members of the Spanish Oncologic Dermatology and Surgery Group (GEDOC) with experience treating melanoma were invited to participate in drafting the guideline. The group developed a new guideline on the basis of existing ones, using the ADAPTE collaboration process, first summarizing the care process and posing relevant clinical questions, then selecting guidelines with the best scores according to the AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation) tool. Finally, the group searched the selected guidelines for answers to the clinical questions, drafted recommendations, and sent them for external review. The guideline is structured around 21 clinical questions chosen for their relevance to issues that make clinical decisions about the management of melanoma difficult. Evidence from existing guidelines was used to answer the questions. A limitation of this guide derives from the scarce evidence available for answering some questions. Moreover, some areas are changing rapidly, so recommendations must be updated often. The present guideline offers answers to clinical questions about the routine management of melanoma in clinical practice and provides dermatologists with a reference to guide decisions, taking into consideration the resources available and patient preferences

Teledermatology before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. / Teledermatología en tiempos de pandemia: El antes, el durante y el después.

The use and acceptance of teledermatology increased more in the last 2 months of the recent lockdown owing to coronavirus disease 2019 than in the preceding 20 years. This sudden popularity -even among the greatest skeptics- was driven by the need to offer solutions to patients in both public and private settings who suddenly found themselves unable to access in-person dermatological care. Even departments already offering an asynchronous, store-and-forward teledermatology service were obliged to create new systems to support direct interaction between specialists and patients (the direct-to-consumer model). This article suggests some practical ways to implement TD safely and to expedite and optimize teleconsultations; these ideas are not just applicable to a pandemic situation.

Clinical Practice Guideline on Melanoma From the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV). / Guía de práctica clínica de melanoma de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología.

Specialist approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma have undergone many changes. This guideline aims to provide Spanish dermatologists with evidence-based information for resolving the most common doubts that arise in clinical practice. Members of the Spanish Oncologic Dermatology and Surgery Group (GEDOC) with experience treating melanoma were invited to participate in drafting the guideline. The group developed a new guideline on the basis of existing ones, using the ADAPTE collaboration process, first summarizing the care process and posing relevant clinical questions, then selecting guidelines with the best scores according to the AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation) tool. Finally, the group searched the selected guidelines for answers to the clinical questions, drafted recommendations, and sent them for external review. The guideline is structured around 21 clinical questions chosen for their relevance to issues that make clinical decisions about the management of melanoma difficult. Evidence from existing guidelines was used to answer the questions. A limitation of this guide derives from the scarce evidence available for answering some questions. Moreover, some areas are changing rapidly, so recommendations must be updated often. The present guideline offers answers to clinical questions about the routine management of melanoma in clinical practice and provides dermatologists with a reference to guide decisions, taking into consideration the resources available and patient preferences.

Which medical disciplines diagnose and treat melanoma in Europe in 2019? A survey of experts from melanoma centres in 27 European countries.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The incidence of melanoma is increasing. This places significant burden on societies to provide efficient cancer care. The European Cancer Organisation recently published the essential requirements for quality melanoma care. The present study is aimed for the first time to roughly estimate the extent to which these requirements have been met in Europe. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based survey of experts from melanoma centres in 27 European countries was conducted from 1 February to 1 August 2019. Data on diagnostic techniques, surgical and medical treatment, organization of cancer care and education were collected and correlated with national health and economic indicators and mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR) as a surrogate for survival. Univariate linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the correlations. SPSS software was used. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The MIR was lower in countries with a high health expenditure per capita and with a higher numbers of general practitioners (GPs) and surgeons (SURG) per million inhabitants. In these countries, GPs and dermatologists (DER) were involved in melanoma detection; high percentage of DER used dermatoscopy and were involved in the follow-up of all melanoma stages; both medical oncologists (ONC) and dermato-oncologists administered systemic treatments; and patients had better access to sentinel lymph node biopsy and were treated within multidisciplinary tumour boards. CONCLUSION: Based on these first estimates, the greater involvement of GPs in melanoma detection; the greater involvement of highly trained DER in dermatoscopy, dermatosurgery, follow-up and the systemic treatment of melanoma; and the provision of ongoing dermato-oncology training for pathologists, SURG, DER and ONC are necessary to provide an optimal melanoma care pathway. A comprehensive analysis of the melanoma care pathway based on clinical melanoma registries will be needed to more accurately evaluate these first insights.

Estimación del efecto en el tamaño y la supervivencia de los tumores cutáneos debido al confinamiento por COVID-19: Modelo basado en un crecimiento exponencial / Estimated Effect of COVID-19 Lockdown on Skin Tumor Size and Survival: AnExponential Growth Model

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Spain is in a situation of indefinite lockdown due to the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. One of the consequences of this lockdown is delays in medical and surgical procedures for common diseases. The aim of this study was to model the impact on survival of tumor growth caused by such delays in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and melanoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study. We constructed an exponential growth model for both SCC and melanoma to estimate tumor growth between patient-reported onset and surgical excision at different time points. RESULTS: Data from 200 patients with SCC of the head and neck and 1000 patients with cutaneous melanoma were included. An exponential growth curve was calculated for each tumor type and we estimated tumor size after 1, 2, and 3 months of potential surgical delay. The proportion of patients with T3 SCC (diameter > 4 cm or thickness > 6 mm) increased from 41.5% (83 patients) in the initial study group to an estimated 58.5%, 70.5%, and 72% after 1, 2, and 3 months of delay. Disease-specific survival at 2, 5, and 10 years in patients whose surgery was delayed by 3 months decreased by 6.2%, 8.2%, and 5.2%, respectively. The proportion of patients with ultrathick melanoma (> 6 mm) increased from 6.9% in the initial study group to 21.9%, 30.2%, and 30.2% at 1, 2, and 3 months. Five-and 10-year disease-specific survival both decreased by 14.4% in patients treated after a potential delay of 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of adequate diagnosis and treatment of SCC and melanoma in the current lockdown situation in Spain, we can expect tosee to a considerable increase in large and thick SCCs and melanomas. Efforts must be taken to encourage self-examination and facilitate access to dermatologists in order to prevent further delays

ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVOS: La pandemia del coronavirus COVID-19 ha provocado un confinamiento indefinido. Una posible consecuencia de esta situación es un retraso en los procedimientos asistenciales de las patologías comunes. El objetivo de este estudio es estimar el hipotético impacto en la supervivencia que tendría el aumento del tamaño tanto para los carcinomas de células escamosas (CCE) como de los melanomas. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de cohortes multicéntrico. Se desarrolló un modelo de crecimiento exponencial para cada tumor basado en el tiempo de evolución que refiere el paciente. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron un total de 200 pacientes con CCEs localizados en la cabeza y el cuello y 1000 pacientes con melanoma cutáneo. Se calculó una curva de crecimiento exponencial para cada tumor y se estimó el tamaño del tumor tras 1, 2 y 3 mes tras el diagnóstico. En la muestra, los CCE mayores de 4 cm o > 6 mm de grosor (definidos como T3) pasaron de 83 (41.5%) en el grupo de estudio real a una estimación de 58,5%, 70,5% y 72% tras 1, 2 y 3 meses de retraso quirúrgico estimado. Se estimó una disminución de la supervivencia específica de enfermedad (SEE) de un 6,2%, 8,2% y 5,2% a los 2, 5 y 10 años, respectivamente, tras tres meses de retraso. Para los melanomas, los melanomas ultragruesos (> 6 mm) pasaron del 6,9% en el grupo de estudio al 21,9%, 30,2% y 30,2% tras 1,2 y 3 meses de demora. La SEE a los 5 y 10 años del grupo de estudio descendió un 14,4% en ambos tiempos. CONCLUSIONES: En ausencia de un adecuado diagnóstico y tratamiento de los pacientes con CCE y melanoma en la actual situación de confinamiento en España, podemos llegar a asistir a un considerable aumento de los casos de CCE y melanomas gruesos y de gran tamaño. Se deben fomentar los esfuerzos para promocionar la autoexploración y facilitar el acceso a los dermatólogos para no aumentar la demora de estos pacientes. Palabras clave: melanoma, pronóstico, diagnóstico precoz, carcinoma de células escamosas cutáneo, COVID-19, confinamiento

[Estimated Effect of COVID-19 Lockdown on Skin Tumor Size and Survival: An Exponential Growth Model]. / Estimación del efecto en el tamaño y la supervivencia de los tumores cutáneos debido al confinamiento por COVID-19: modelo basado en un crecimiento exponencial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Spain is in a situation of indefinite lockdown due to the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. One of the consequences of this lockdown is delays in medical and surgical procedures for common diseases. The aim of this study was to model the impact on survival of tumor growth caused by such delays in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and melanoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study. We constructed an exponential growth model for both SCC and melanoma to estimate tumor growth between patient-reported onset and surgical excision at different time points. RESULTS: Data from 200 patients with SCC of the head and neck and 1000 patients with cutaneous melanoma were included. An exponential growth curve was calculated for each tumor type and we estimated tumor size after 1, 2, and 3 months of potential surgical delay. The proportion of patients with T3 SCC (diameter >4cm or thickness >6 mm) increased from 41.5% (83 patients) in the initial study group to an estimated 58.5%, 70.5%, and 72% after 1, 2, and 3 months of delay. Disease-specific survival at 2, 5, and 10 years in patients whose surgery was delayed by 3 months decreased by 6.2%, 8.2%, and 5.2%, respectively. The proportion of patients with ultrathick melanoma (>6 mm) increased from 6.9% in the initial study group to 21.9%, 30.2%, and 30.2% at 1, 2, and 3 months. Five- and 10-year disease-specific survival both decreased by 14.4% in patients treated after a potential delay of 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of adequate diagnosis and treatment of SCC and melanoma in the current lockdown situation in Spain, we can expect to see to a considerable increase in large and thick SCCs and melanomas. Efforts must be taken to encourage self-examination and facilitate access to dermatologists in order to prevent further delays.

Microscopia confocal ex vivo con método de fusión y tinción digital: cambiando paradigmas en el diagnóstico histológico / Ex Vivo Confocal Microscopy Using Fusion Mode and Digital Staining: Changing Paradigms in Histological Diagnosis

La microscopia confocal ex vivo es un sistema de procesamiento de tejidos que permite el análisis histológico inmediato de tejidos extirpados por medio de láseres diodo con distintos espectros de longitud de onda. En estudios previos la microscopia confocal ex vivo reduce el tiempo de análisis de márgenes de forma muy notable, con una sensibilidad y especificidad respecto a la histopatología del 88% y 99%, respectivamente. Recientemente se ha desarrollado una nueva tecnología que es capaz de proveer imágenes digitales con mayor velocidad y mejor resolución que las obtenidas en los dispositivos previos. Mediante el método de fusión (láseres de fluorescencia y reflectancia que escanean simultáneamente), se reproduce con una tinción digital la hematoxilina y eosina de forma inmediata en cada imagen. La implementación de esta nueva tecnología ha abierto definitivamente una puerta en el diagnóstico inmediato de tejidos

The ex vivo confocal microscope is an imaging system designed to analyze freshly excised tissue using two diode lasers with different wavelengths. The technique can dramatically reduce margin analysis times and offers a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 89% relative to histopathology. A new technology has recently been developed that produces images more quickly and with a higher resolution than before. By means of a fusion mode that combines simultaneously scanned fluorescence and reflectance images, it produces digitally stained images that simulate the effect of hematoxylin-eosin staining. Application of this new technology has opened the door to real-time tissue diagnostics